Alternative Pathways for Medical Device Market Authorisation

29 April 2021 |

Hand,Moving,Pawn,On,A,Conceptual,Maze.,Shortcut,To,Success

It is no question that in order to obtain market authorisation to import, manufacture and sell a medical device, manufacturers or applicants must adhere to the jurisdiction-specific regulations.

Despite this, continual advancements in medical device technology have encouraged the progression of regulatory practices and global harmonisation strategies that have fostered the implementation of alternate pathways to market. Leading regulators have adopted routes that in some instances, aim to fast-track public access to innovative and emergency use devices, and in other circumstances allow applicants to leverage on existing overseas approvals and documentation to accelerate standard review and approval timelines. Here are a few examples:

Accelerated access to Innovative and Emergency Use Devices

The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) are two of the leading global regulators that have implemented programs that manufacturers of innovative or emergency use devices can utilise to accelerate timelines to market, influencing regulators globally.

Innovative Devices

The following two pathways are primarily intended for innovative devices that provide a more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening diseases, treat an unmet clinical need where no alternative exists and exhibit a significant clinical advantage over existing devices:

  • US FDA Breakthrough devices program – assists manufacturers by enabling ongoing consultation with the FDA throughout the development and assessment processes
  • Australian TGA Priority Applicant Pathway – allows those eligible to essentially “jump to the front of the queue” for review, aiming to reduce timelines to market.

Following suit, Japan’s Sakigake designation system acts similarly to the FDA designation system, providing fast-track approval for innovative devices, while Singapore’s priority review scheme, pushes forward qualifying device applications for review, to enable public access to necessary medical technologies.

Emergency and Compassionate Use Devices

Certain pathways also exist for patients access to unapproved medical devices for emergency and compassionate use purposes:

  • US FDA Investigational Devices Exemption (IDE)
  • Australian TGA Special Access Scheme (SAS)
  • Singapore’s Special Authorisation Route (SAR) and
  • Malaysia’s Special Access Pathway (SAP)

These apply in circumstances where an individual patient or small groups of patients suffering a life-threatening or serious disease or illness, require immediate intervention to sustain life where no alternative exists. Although these pathways have particular circumstances that must be adhered to, and often involve the judgment of a healthcare professional, they focus on addressing clinical needs in public health to provide timely access to required medical devices.

What the COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique circumstance where the great demand for specified medical devices, equipment and pharmaceuticals required significant adaptation of existing regulations to facilitate access. Standard regulatory procedures and timelines to market were greatly reduced globally, presenting manufacturers with an opportunity to import, and supply required medical products in a timely manner. This may also predict the future evolution of global regulations to incorporate permanent pathways that account for these large-scale public health emergencies.

Leveraging Overseas Approvals

In some instances, several global regulators allow manufacturers to leverage on existing overseas medical device approvals, decreasing overall review timelines. These include but are not limited to:

  • Australia’s acceptance of comparable overseas approvals in combination with Medical Devices Single Audit Program (MDSAP) certification
  • Singapore’s expedited and abridged registration routes
  • Malaysia’s recognition of foreign approvals
  • India’s recognition of overseas approvals

It is important to note, that the assessment conducted by a regulator is based on the individual subject device and hence the suitability of a particular pathway must be made on a case-by-case basis. Our team is here to support you with navigating the most appropriate application route for your device.

We tailor our services to the requirements of your business and can help you implement plans that are best suited to your projects. Contact us now to discuss your needs and how we can help. You can drop us an email [email protected] or call 1 888-271-5063 (US toll-free) ♦ +61 2 9906 2984 (Sydney)

Disclaimer
The views and options expressed in this article are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of Brandwood CKC Pty Ltd ACN 128 762 505.

The information presented in this article is of a general nature only and does not consider the particular circumstances of your business. Prior results and case studies do not guarantee a similar outcome in future. You should not rely on this information, and you should seek specific advice for your particular business needs.

Where indicated, certain content has been sourced from third parties; we have not independently verified it. Neither Brandwood CKC nor the author makes any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of this article, nor do those parties accept any liability or responsibility arising in any way from omissions or errors contained in the content.

Search

Recent Posts

Categories

Categories

Archives

Archives

Archives